|
Date, Country, Type and ref. no. of communication |
Mandates | Summary | Replies received |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Information received concerning the reported use of the rebuttable presumption of wrongdoing or presumption of guilt, and de facto reversal of the burden of proof, as a recurrent practice in sanctions-related cases, in particular in sanctions designations of persons and entities, as well as in the review and de-listing procedures. This issues has been briefly addressed by the Special Rapporteur on the negative impact of unilateral coercive measures in her thematic report to the 79th session of the UN General Assembly on “Access to justice in the face of unilateral sanctions and over-compliance (A/79/183).Alleged victims: - More details... | |
|
|
Information received concerning the reported use of the rebuttable presumption of wrongdoing or presumption of guilt, and de facto reversal of the burden of proof, as a recurrent practice in sanctions-related cases, in particular in sanctions designations of persons and entities, as well as in the review and de-listing procedures. This issues has been briefly addressed by the Special Rapporteur on the negative impact of unilateral coercive measures in her thematic report to the 79th session of the UN General Assembly on “Access to justice in the face of unilateral sanctions and over-compliance (A/79/183).Alleged victims: - More details... |
15 Apr 2025 |
Communication report and search
OHCHR.org
